OPINION HOLDS: Because Kehoe has not proved any of her claims of ineffective assistance have merit, we affirm the denial of her application for PCR. In her supplemental pro se brief, Kehoe joins some of the arguments made by counsel and also lists a number of errors she believes the PCR court made in its ruling. Kehoe argues she received ineffective assistance from trial counsel when counsel failed to 1) move to suppress the incriminating statements she made to police while in the hospital without first receiving Miranda warnings, 2) secure a different, more remote change of venue, and 3) raise the issue of Kehoe’s competency to stand trial. Michelle Kehoe appeals from the denial of her application for postconviction relief (PCR), following her 2009 convictions for murder in the first degree, attempted murder, and child endangerment resulting in serious injury. Considered by Vaitheswaran, P.J., and Potterfield and Doyle, JJ. Judicial Branch Building Media InterviewsĪppeal from the Iowa District Court for Buchanan County, Richard D.Judicial Branch Building and Courthouse Tours.Information for Current Shorthand Reporters.Commission on Continuing Legal Education.Commission on Unauthorized Practice of Law.Considering Retiring From The Practice of Law?.Submission of CLE Programs by CLE Sponsors.State Court Administration Organizational Chart.Information for Current Court Interpreters.How to Become a Qualified Court Interpreter in Iowa.Archived Court of Appeals Opinions from 2017 and Earlier.Archived Court of Appeals Opinions from to.Opinions Archive 2014–2015 Adjudicative.Opinions Archive 2015–2016 Adjudicative.Opinions Archive 2016–2017 Adjudicative.Opinions Archive 2017–2018 Adjudicative.Archived Supreme Court Opinions Prior to 2017.Reporter Resources Expanded News Media Coverage News Releases Public Records Requests Open Search Bar
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |